Rtx 3070 benchmark6/12/2023 ![]() ![]() In fact, it can’t even hang tough at 1440p with the RTX 3070, which cost $500 in 2020. Now that we’ve tested the RTX 4060 Ti, we can confirm that it indeed slows down at the higher 1440p resolution. ![]() When that happens, the memory requests go out to traditional memory-and the RTX 4060 Ti’s much smaller 128-bit bus might falter when that happens.” Higher resolutions have higher memory needs, which results in fewer successful on-die cache hits. Here’s the thing though: As evidenced in our review of the last-gen Radeon RX 6600 XT, which had 32MB of Infinity Cache and a 128-bit bus, pairing a big on-die cache with a neutered bus width helps the GPU perform exceptionally-both in performance and power-at the display resolution it’s targeted for, but usually results in lower-than-expected results at higher resolutions. The company says the larger L2 cache particularly helps improve ray tracing and DLSS performance, and results in the “effective” memory bandwidth shown in the technical specifications slide. While AMD’s Infinity Cache uses an 元 cache, Nvidia opted for a 32MB L2 cache instead (versus just 4MB on the 3060 Ti). Not only does the closer physical proximity mean this cache is faster, but deploying it also reduces the need to send many requests out to the memory chips arrayed around the GPU itself, as illustrated in the slides above. Nvidia swiped a page from AMD’s killer Infinity Cache technology for RTX 40-series offerings, dropping a large on-die cache onto the GPU itself, and the RTX 4060 family is no different. A comparison image showing how the larger L2 cache in Nvidia’s RTX 40-series (“Ada Lovelace”) GPUs helps result in far fewer calls to traditional memory. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |